CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST

The Birth Certificate is an unrevealed "Trust Instrument" originally designed for the children of the newly freed black slaves after the 14th Amendment.

The CESTUI QUE VIE Trust is an account you inherited due to the bankruptcy of the U.S. in 1933 and the subsequent ceasing of all the citizens gold, silver and other assets as collateral. This account contains millions of dollars in your name. The only problem is that the government and legal system failed to inform you about it and how to access your money. In the meantime, they are drawing down on it for their own personal use and as payment to the Vatican and the English crown.

“Our problem is that we have been kept ignorant as to what we can do, other than just complain.

But, I am telling you we have discovered how to access your Social Security Number Trust”

=========================

To cover the debt in 1933 and future debt, the corporate government determined and established the value of the future labor of each individual in its jurisdiction to be $630,000. A bond of $630,000 is set on each Certificate of Live Birth. The certificates are bundled together into sets and then placed as securities on the open market. These certificates are then purchased by the Federal Reserve and/or foreign bankers. The purchaser is the "holder" of "Title." This process made each and every PERSON surety for the debt in this jurisdiction and a bond servant.

A Claim of Right and Notice of Intent provides remedy for overcoming the presumption that you are a fictitious, lifeless corporate entity and surety for the debt.

Claim of Right and Notice of Intent

"I am a living spirit and child of God. His laws subrogate all of man’s codes, regulations, laws and statutes. I live in the truth, abundance and peace of His ways. I am ineligible for the benefits of man’s system. I do not understand the complexities and deceptions of man’s laws. I do not understand or consent to corporate governance and greed. God’s creation is unlimited abundant and giving. His path is righteous, peaceful and all loving. His Spirit inspires and guides me to do no harm and to avoid fraud in all my contracts."

"None are more enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."

In 1933 rather than gold reserves backing the dollar, people became surety for the debt in a number of different ways. One way is by a Birth Certificate when the baby's footprint is placed thereon before it touches the land. The certificate is recorded at a County Recorder, then sent to a Secretary of State who sends it to the Bureau of Census of the Commerce Department. This process converts an individual's life, labor, and property to an asset of the government when this person/citizen receives a ‘benefit’ from the government such as a driver’s license, food stamps, free mail delivery, etc.

This person/citizen [STRAWMAN] unknowingly becomes a fictional persona in commerce as evidenced by the all CAPITAL LETTER name. The Birth Certificate is an unrevealed "Trust Instrument" originally designed for the children of the newly freed black slaves after the 14th Amendment. The corporate government has the ability to tax and regulate commerce for all citizens who have not reclaimed their TITLE.

The government issued Birth Certificate is now a Registered Security, by evidence of the Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures (CUSIP) number, which initially has an estimated value of One Million dollars.

They are circulated around the world as collateral for loans and entered on the asset side of ledgers just like any other security. That is why they are initially filed with the N.Y. Securities Exchange Commission.

The central banks now have a negotiable instrument against which credit is advanced by the international funding community, namely The World Bank, International Monetary Fund, and Bank for International Settlements, Bank of England, and Federal Bank of America etc.

Though not widely known, all these corporate banks and institutions, despite their names; are privately owned.

Notice: YOUR ACCOUNT set up by your BIRTH CERTIFICATE is on file at Treasury. The name of the account is the CAPITAL LETTER name on the birth certificate and the account number is your Social Security Number.

In 1921, the federal Sheppard-Towner Maternity Act created the birth "registration" or what we now know as the "Birth Certificate." It was known as the "Maternity Act" and was sold to the American people as a law that would reduce maternal and infant mortality, protect the health of mothers and infants, and for "other purposes.” One of those other purposes provided for state agencies in overseeing of its operations and expenditures. What it really did was create a federal "birth registry" which exists today, creating "FEDERAL CHILDREN." 

This government of "Parens Patriae”, now legislates for children as if they are owned (via registration) by the federal government. Through the public (fool) school system families are led to believe in the importance continuing license requirements for most aspects of daily life. As a direct result these children grow up to be adults indoctrinated into believing those things necessary to carry our activities that exist in what is call a "free country.” A license = ownership/control. Why would we ever give the government ownership of our children? 

The insanity of it all is that we ‘register’ without even questioning it! We have been so well indoctrinated by the public ‘fool’ system. It’s just the way things are done. 

The ‘brainwashing’ is very effective when no one questions!

Before 1921, the records of births and names of children were entered into the family bibles, as were the records of marriages and deaths. These records were readily accepted by both the family and the law as "official records.” Since 1921, the American people have been registering the births and names of their children with the government of the state in which they are born, even though there is no federal law requiring it. The state tells you that registering your child's birth through the birth certificate serves proof that he/she was born in the united States, thereby making him/her a United States Citizen. For the past several years a social security number has been mandated by the federal government to be issued at birth.

The Social Security Number (your account number) is one of those "other purposes.” It serves as a means of lifelong tracking of the one whose name is on the birth certificate.

In 1933, the united States of America (the Corporate Government) was declared bankrupt by President Roosevelt. The governors of the then 48 States pledged the "full faith and credit" of each of their States, including the CITIZENRY AS COLLATERAL, for loans of credit from the Federal Reserve System.

To wit; "FULL FAITH AND CREDIT” the clause of the U.S. Constitution (Article IV, Section 1) which provides that the various states must recognize legislative acts, public records, and judicial decisions of the other states, It requires that foreign judgment be given such faith and credit as it had by law or usage of state of its origin. That foreign statutes are to have force and effect to which they are entitled in home state.

And that a judgment of record shall have the same FAITH, CREDIT CONCLUSIVE EFFECT, and obligatory force in other states as it has by law or usage in the state from whence taken. Black's Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition

After receiving the information of live birth and other particulars for the birth certificate accompanied by the assigned social security number, the state claims an interest in every child within its jurisdiction. The state will, if it deems it necessary, nullify your parental rights and appoint a guardian trustee) over your children. The subject of every birth certificate is a child. The child is a valuable asset which, if properly trained, can contribute valuable assets provided by its labor for many years. The child itself is the asset of the trust established by the birth certificate and social security number is the account number of the trust, allowing for the trust's assets to be tracked. Our children are owned by the state.

Each one of us, including our children, are considered assets of a "bankrupt" Republic of South Africa, and most other states including the United States Corporations. We are now designated by this government as "HUMAN RESOURCES” born in a DELIVERY room, delivered to the state of birth by way of the BIRTH CERTIFICATE for which our INFORMER (our Mother) provides the requested information including the NAME and SOCIAL SECURITY (or tracking) NUMBER wherewith this bankrupt government is supplied with new crop of COLLATERAL born each year.

In 1923, a suit was brought against "federal officials" (corporation6) charged with the administration of the Maternity Act, who were citizens of another state, to enjoin them from enforcing it, wherein the plaintiff averred that the act was unconstitutional, and that its purpose was to induce the States to yield sovereign rights reserved by them through the federal Constitution's 10th amendment and not granted to the federal government, and that the burden of the appropriations falls unequally upon the several States held that, as the statute does not require the plaintiff to do or yield anything and no burden is imposed by it other than that of taxation, which falls not on the State but on its inhabitants, who are within the federal as well as the state taxing power, the complaint resolves down to the naked contention that Congress has usurped reserved powers of the States by the mere enactment of the statute, though nothing has been, or is to be, done under it without their consent. (Commonwealth of Massachusetts vs. Melton, Secretary of the Treasury, et.al; Frothingham vs. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, et.al.)

Mr. Alexander Lincoln, Assistant Attorney General, argued for the Commonwealth Massachusetts. To wit; The act is unconstitutional. It purports to vest in agencies of the Federal Government (a Corporation6) powers which are almost wholly undefined, in matters relating to maternity and infancy, and to authorize appropriations of federal funds for the purpose of the act.

Many examples may be given and were stated in the debates on the bill in Congress of regulations which may be imposed under the act; THE FORCED REGISTRATION OF PREGNANCY, GOVERNMENT PRENATAL EXAMINATION OF EXPECTANT MOTHERS, RESTRICTIONS OF THE RIGHT OF A WOMAN TO SECURE THE SERVICES OF A MIDWIFE OR PHYSICIAN OF HER OWN SELECTION, all are measures to which the people of those States which accept its provisions may be subjected. 

There is nothing, which prohibits the payment of subsidies out of Federal appropriations. INSURANCE OF MOTHERS MAY BE MADE COMPULSORY. THE TEACHING OF BIRTH CONTROL AND PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF PERSONS ABOUT TO MARRY MAYBE REQUIRED by Section 4 of the act, the Children's Bureau is given all necessary powers to cooperate with the state agencies in the administration of the act. Hence it is given the power of assist in the plans submitted may provide. As to what those plans shall provide, the final arbiters are the Bureau and the Board.

The FACT THAT IT WAS CONSIDERED NECESSARY IN EXPLICIT TERMS TO PRESERVE FROM INVASION BY FEDERAL OFFICIALS THE RIGHT OF THE PARENT TO THE CUSTODY AND CARE OF HIS CHILD AND THE SANCTITY OF HIS HOME SHOWS HOW FAR REACHING ARE THE POWERS WHICH WERE INTENDED TO BE GRANTED BY THE ACT

(1) The act is invalid because it assumes powers not Granted to Congress and usurps the local police power. McCulloch vs. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 405; United States vs. Cruickshank, 92 U.S. 542, 549-551.

In more recent cases, however, the Court has shown that there are limits to the power of Congress to pass legislation purporting to be based on one of the powers expressly granted to Congress which in fact usurps the reserved powers of the States, and that laws showing on their face detailed regulations of matter wholly within the Police power of the States will be held to be unconstitutional although they purport to be passed in the exercise of some constitutional power, Hammer vs. Dagenhart, 247,259 U.S.4  

The act is not made valid by the circumstances that federal powers are to be exercised only with respect to those States which accept the act, for Congress cannot assume, and state legislatures cannot yield, the powers reserved to the States by the Constitution. President Monroe, May 4, 1822;

(2) The act is invalid because it imposes on each State an illegal option either to yield a part of its powers reserved by the Tenth Amendment10 or to give up its share of appropriations under the act. A statute attempting, by imposing conditions upon a general privilege, to exact a waiver of a constitutional right, is null and void. Harrison vs. St. Louis & San Francisco R.R. Co., 232 U.S. 318; Terral vs. Burke Construction Co., 257 U.S. 529.

(3) The act is invalid because it sets up a system of government by cooperation between the Federal Government (a Corporation) and certain of the States, not provided by the Constitution. Congress cannot make laws for the States, and it cannot delegate to the States the power to make laws for the United States. In re: Rabrer, 140 U.S. 545; Knickerbocker Ice Co. vs. Stewart, 253 U.S. 149; Opinion of the Justices, 239 Mass. 606.

The MATERNITY ACT was eventually repealed, but parts of it have been found in other legislative acts. What this ACT attempted to do was to set up government by appointment, run by bureaucrats with re-delegated authority to tax, which is in itself unconstitutional. What was once declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of this nation in the past should be upheld in a court challenge today. The constitution has not changed. What has changed is the way this government views human life.

Today we are defined as HUMAN RESOURCES, believed to be owned by the government. The government now wants us, as individuals, to be tagged and tracked. Government mandated or legislated National I.D., which is unconstitutional. Federal jurisdiction to legislate for the several states does not exist and could never survive a court challenge as shown above. Writing letters to elected public servants will not save us when we all know their agenda does not include serving those who placed them in power (servitude).

TAX EVASION: FRAUD in Representation or Concealment in attempting to avoid payment of a Tax Legally Due. As in the case of an INCOME TAX, the filing of a return fraudulently understated in a willful attempt to evade payment Willingham v United States 289 F.2d 283 (5th Cir. 1961); Swallow v. United States, 325 F.2d 97 (10th Cir. 1963) “A felony punishable by a fine of not more than $10,000 or up to F1VE year’s imprisonment, or both. Internal Revenue Code §7201.” [The Governmental BANKRUPT Corporations are claiming exemption status as a Charitable Organization but they are in fact operating FOR UNJUST PROFITS.]

CONCEALMENT OF SECURITIES: The OFFENCE (punishable by up to SEVEN year’s imprisonment) of dishonestly Concealing, Destroying, or Defacing any valuable Security, Will, or any document issuing from a court OR Government Department for the purpose of gain for oneself or causing loss to another. Valuable securities include any documents concerning rights over property, authorizing payment of money or the delivery of property, or evidencing such rights or the satisfying of any obligation.

DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: The DUTY of local authority members to disclose (at the time or by prior notice to the authority) any pecuniary interest they or their spouses have in any matter discussed at a local authority meeting. They MUST also abstain from speaking and voting on it.

Breach of the Duty is a CRIMINAL OFFENCE. [This includes bailment5 payments in to the retirement funds of all COURT Agents; TAX FREE or never recorded on 1099’s.

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (PERS): Governmental BANKRUPT Kickbacks From the Security Interest in the fraudulent Governmental BANKRUPT Tax payments obtained from the People and their property; when the BANKRUPT STATE is already holding the Security Tax Interest Income in the Hidden Off-Budget Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Accounts.

PROCURING BREACH OF CONTRACT (Inducing Breach of Contract) The TORT of Intentionally Persuading or Inducing someone to break a contract made by him with a third party. It is actionable by the party who suffers LOSS from the Breach. [This is done when the BAR Attorneys induce you to pay TAXES out of your pocket, because you have a Contract with the STATE that they are to PAY the TAXES.]

INTERFERING WITH TRADE OR BUSINESS: The TORT of deliberately interfering with the trade or business of another person by unlawful means, thereby causing damage to that person. Liability in this TORT is wider than the TORT of *procuring breach of contract, since it is not necessary to show that an existing contract has been interfered with or broken. [SEE Title 15 USC § 1&2]

torture: n. The prohibition on torture is covered under The Civil Rights Act; it is also covered by the United Nations’ Civil Rights protections, the offence of TORTURE committed by a public official (or someone with the official's acquiescence') of intentionally inflicting severe Physical or Mental Suffering on any person anywhere in the world. It carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. under this Act, the accused had a defense if he proved that his conduct was legally authorized, justified, or excusable. This right is an absolute right, and torture can never be justified as being in the public interest, no matter how great that pubic interest might be. Public authorities have a limited but positive duty to protect this Right from interference by third parties.

ward of the state:

A CHILD becomes a WARD OF THE STATE when a Certificate of Live Birth or Any STATE CHILD Contract is issued is made and the STATE'S DUTY to the Ward is to pay all Bills and it remains until he/she reaches the age of majority (18 years old) OR until a court orders that he should cease to be a Ward and all Entitlements Restored to the Ward.

======================== 

All courts are administering the Cestui Que Trust without you!

Roles of the CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST in a court setting:

YOU (THE LIVING MAN/WOMAN) are the BENEFICIARY of the CQV trust.

The judge (whom is actually a magistrate) is the TRUSTEE of the CQV trust.

The clerk is the ADMINISTRATOR of the CQV trust

It is the clerk of court who is responsible for appointing the trustee and the trustee/executor for a court appearance and it’s really for constructing a constructive trust – that particular court case that you have been summoned/invited to make an appearance to attend.

The clerk of the court is the Beneficiary because the State owns you and you have no rights; “A CHILD becomes a WARD OF THE STATE when a Certificate of Live Birth or Any STATE CHILD Contract is issued.”

The clerk of court, the pseudo-beneficiary, appoints the judge as trustee (the one to administer the trust, without you) and appoints the prosecutor as trustee/executor of the trust. The prosecutor is ultimately liable for the charge because it was he/she who brought the case into court (he is the one who created the constructive trust on behalf of the State which charged the Cestui Que trust.

Only a prosecutor/trustee can initiate/create a constructive trust and we all know the maxim of law: “Whoever creates the controversy holds the liability and whoever holds the liability must provide the remedy.” This is why all attorneys are mandated to bring their check books to court because if it all goes wrong for them …meaning either they fail to transfer their liability onto the alleged defendant, or the alleged defendant does not accept their office of liability, then someone has to credit the trust account in order to off-set the debt. Since the prosecutor/trustee is the one who issues bogus paper and charges the trust, it is the Prosecutor/Executor/Trustee who is in the hot- seat.

When the NAME (the trust), e.g. JOHN DOE, is called by the Judge / Administrator / Trustee, we can stand and ask, “Are you saying that the trust which you are now administrating is the JOHN DOE trust?

This establishes that we know that the NAME is a trust, not a live man or woman. What’s the JUDGE, ADMINISTRATOR, TRUSTEE’S first question asked? “What is your name?” or “State your name for the record.” We must be very careful not to identify with the NAME of the trust because by doing so makes us the trustee “in breach” of the Trust; “the surety.” What does this tell you about the Judge?

If we know that the Judge is the trustee, then we also know that the Judge is the NAME, but only for this particular constructive trust. Now, think about all the times that the Judge / Administrator / Trustee has become frustrated by our refusal to admit being the Name that they issue on a warrant or summons. They become desperate because they must get us to admit to being the NAME, or they pay, and we must not accept their threats or coercion, or we pay. 

Because the JUDGE, ADMINISTRATOR, TRUSTEE is the trustee – a precarious position, the best thing to say, in that case, is, “JOHN DOE is, indeed, in the court.” Point to the JUDGE, ADMINISTRATOR, TRUSTEE, “It is you as trustee, you are JOHN DOE, today, aren’t you?

Basically, courts are charging the all-caps NAME which is a TRUST. They hope that you will identify yourself as the trust – and give them access to the trust via your signature.

In the corporate Matrix, everything is held in a Public Trust, and the way the Elite get access to the trust is to CHARGE the TRUST and then get you to admit that you are the TRUST/NAME.